A team running bulk generation does not search for a supplier. It complains — about an API bill that tripled, about rate limits in production, about a model that has to run somewhere cheaper. The complaint is the lead, and it is written in the chat where they work, usually while annoyed.
Status. Configured, 17 chats connected, and zero matching requests so far. That is the honest number and it is worth more than a flattering one: it says the vocabulary or the chat list is wrong, not that the market is. This is exactly the case where we would tell a customer not to pay yet.
Somebody buying inference or generation capacity for their own product or their clients': a per-token price that stopped working at volume, throughput they cannot get, a model they need hosted.
In AI chats the loudest voices are the sellers, which is why this niche is so easy to get wrong.
Chats of AI development, automation and integration agencies, chats around specific tooling, and communities of studios that ship content in volume.
Seventeen chats and no leads in a week does not mean nobody has this problem. It means the words we listen for are not the words these teams use, or that the chats we picked are read by builders rather than buyers. This is the failure the product is designed to surface early — before an invoice, not after one.
The quoted messages are typical of the niche, written out rather than copied: real ones belong to the people who wrote them and to the customer they were delivered to. What we can show you is your own — connect a chat and we will measure it before you pay. @SonarLeadSupport